Montana Meth Project Persists, Despite Failure

by William Skink

The Missoula Independent this week takes a look at the return of meth in Montana with a feature piece by Kate Whittle, titled Not Even Close, a play on the infamous Not Even Once marketing campaign from the Montana Meth Project.

Why has meth returned with a vengeance? Answering that questions won’t be easy, so maybe our state leaders should begin with identifying what ISN’T working. Will that happen? Not during an election season, and here’s why.

Nine years ago the Montana Meth Project was winning awards and the accolades of Montana politicians who jumped at the chance to throw state money into the pot, though some had reservations at the time:

Rep. Mary Caferro, D-Helena, said many of her colleagues are supporting additional funding for the program for political gain.

“It’s simple, it’s easy and looks good, and it’s popular,” Caferro said. “But it leaves out a big piece of the picture, which is investing in children’s health care and education, which isn’t as sexy.”

House Republicans have cut millions of dollars from the governor’s original budget, which they have argued was bloated and wastes taxpayers dollars. The cuts included

$4.3 million that was axed from the meth treatment centers advertised as a way to reduce the prison population.

Critics argue there is a much greater need to fund treatment facilities than the ad campaign, and they point out that the Meth Project itself is producing the surveys that show its success.

That was April, 2007. Now, nine years later, Whittle provides some updated info on what happened during those subsequent year:

A 2008 study published in Prevention Science determined the Meth Project’s tactics actually led to “increases in the acceptability of using methamphetamine and decreases in the perceived danger of using drugs.” The study also accused the Meth Project of cherry-picking its data to seem more successful, considering that Montana teen meth use, as reported by the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, had already been decreasing since 1999. In light of the criticism, then-Gov. Brian Schweitzer used his line-item veto to slash public funding to the Meth Project.

Despite the drug’s resurgence within the state in the last few years, the Meth Project continues to claim credit for spreading awareness about its dangers and reducing first-time use. In 2015, the Montana Meth Project celebrated “10 years of unselling meth.” The project’s current activities are a shadow of its heyday, but it’s still running active social media campaigns and contests, like this year’s “Life or Meth” video submissions competition. It reported about $260,000 in income on its 2014 tax return, almost entirely from private contributions. First Lady Lisa Bullock is listed as a member of its board of directors.

Ah, so despite the fact the Montana Meth Project has been a complete failure at stopping people from trying meth, just like the JUST SAY NO campaign was during the 80’s, it’s got the wife of the Governor on its board of directors, so fat chance on killing this worthless project while the Governor tries to get himself reelected. Is that why no one returned Kate’s call?

The Montana Meth Project didn’t return the Indy’s requests for an interview, however Executive Director Amy Rue has acknowledged meth’s return. In a November 2015 story in the Flathead Beacon, she’s quoted as telling the paper, “The mission is still the same, we’re driven and motivated to reduce first time meth use among Montana teens.”

Don’t worry, Amy, even though the effort you are heading is a total failure, if you have the Governor on your side, I’m sure you will be insulated from the reality of that failure. At least until November.

And what are those efforts? Well, if you head on over to the Missoulian, you will find out what the latest waste of time and money from the MMP entails:

The Montana Meth Project is calling all Treasure State filmmakers as the organization gathers submissions for a national 30-second commercial competition featuring a grand prize of $20,000 and nationwide air time for the winner.

Aspiring and established filmmakers from around the United States are encouraged to create an impactful commercial centered on the theme of “Life or Meth.” The submissions will be evaluated by four of the country’s Meth Project executive directors. The 10 best submissions will be invited to participate in an exclusive panel to be held at Series Fest in Denver on June 22-26.

Fantastic, more commercials that don’t work and money that isn’t going to increasing access to treatment. What a fucking joke.

I truly hate politics. It’s all about image over substance, and reality need not apply during an election season.

Democrats are invested in the image that everything is A-OK in Montana because they want to maintain control of the Governor’s office. I get that, and I’ll probably even end up voting for Steve Bullock just to ensure the worst legislative damage from the extreme right can be vetoed.

But everything is not A-OK in Montana, and Whittle’s piece is just the tip of the iceberg.

I guess we’ll have to wait until after November to acknowledge the reality of what service providers and first responders already know: it’s bad out there, and getting worse.

Advertisements

About William Skink

I'm a poet and political cynic living and writing in Montana. You can contact me here: willskink at yahoo dot com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Montana Meth Project Persists, Despite Failure

  1. Greg Strandberg says:

    Good post. I won’t be falling for that lesser of the two evils nonsense, myself. If the blame lies with Bullock – and so much in the state does (Engstrom’s continued reign, anyone?) – then I’m not voting for the fool.

    We need to look at the problems that are creating a demand for meth. I’d say poverty is a leading one. Maybe if people had a job with meaning, and a feeling of purpose in life because of it, they wouldn’t feel the need for meth. I dunno.

    Why do we have so much child abuse? There’s another issue where I think poverty is a leading cause. Low education and alcohol and mental health are other issues we could work on. When I say work on I mean come up with solutions, not just study the problem so a few insiders can profit.

    Like

  2. 01stevekelly says:

    Hitting some major issues.

    Stepping back a few paces is this from Dmitry at http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/

    He’s talking about Ted, “The Unabomber” and the technosphere. Is this any place for humans?

    “He was quite withering in his critique of the liberal left which, he thought, excelled in the extreme hypocrisy of championing the cause of groups it thought to be inferior in order to oppress all of society through oversocialization, feminization and the imposition of political correctness. This was mostly the work of heterosexual white males, for nothing much can happen without their approval and support:
    The guardians of political correctness (mostly white, uppper-middle-class heterosexuals) identify with groups of people they see as weak or inferior while denying (even to themselves) that they consider them to be such.:

    “He was extremely clear on one point: that the needed change could not possibly come from any place on the existing political spectrum. He was quite withering in his critique of the liberal left which, he thought, excelled in the extreme hypocrisy of championing the cause of groups it thought to be inferior in order to oppress all of society through oversocialization, feminization and the imposition of political correctness. This was mostly the work of heterosexual white males, for nothing much can happen without their approval and support:

    The guardians of political correctness (mostly white, uppper-middle-class heterosexuals) identify with groups of people they see as weak or inferior while denying (even to themselves) that they consider them to be such.”

    Like

  3. Good article indeed, and it illustrates the futility of dealing with the political class or looking to them for real leadership. They are merely low-character people who have internalized the essence of politics, that politicians are only allowed to succeed as puppets and and are not real leaders. They are happy knowing this, ergo poseurs. Spending months supporting or opposing their campaigns is useless, it an activity their puppet masters wholly approve of, as it keeps regular people out of their hair and out of real policy debates.

    You may see through it, Skink, but having a perceived “liberal” like Bullock in office merely allows Democrats to sleep at the wheel, thinking he’s got their back. And they do sleep through non-election years, if you haven’t noticed, focused in total on the evil of the other party if paying any attention at all.

    Like

  4. Big Swede says:

    Nancy Reagan was the reason I never did drugs.

    Like

  5. Pingback: Son of ICYMI | Intelligent Discontent

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s